![]() |
Baroness Sarah Ludford MEP Liberal Democrat Member of the European Parliament for London |
![]() |
| Happy Advent! | <office@sarahludfordmep.org.uk> | 1st December 2008 |
European Data Protection Day highlights paucity of UK Information Commissioner powers2.34.31pm UTC (GMT +0000) Mon 28th Jan 2008 Today, January 28th 2008, is European Data Protection Day, which marks the signing over 25 years ago of the Convention of the Council of Europe (not an EU body) on the automatic processing of personal data. Since its creation in 1981 this convention still remains the only binding international legal instrument on data protection covering police and criminal cooperation. The EU has a Data Protection Directive of 1995 which applies to data used for purposes other than security, but as EU data exchange and building of databases for border and crime control has accelerated, the European Parliament has pushed EU governments to agree modern privacy rules on data used for law enforcement purposes. They have so far failed to agree robust protections. Commenting on the anniversary, Baroness Sarah Ludford MEP, Liberal Democrat European Justice Spokeswoman, said: "This commemoration will hold only an ironic significance for the British public, since the lessons of recent data scandals have still not been learnt. The UK has the largest DNA database in the world, with nearly 4 million entries including those never charged and those acquitted. I am fighting to ensure that British people will not have their DNA passed around Europe like a cheap trading card. "Despite various ambivalent noises from Gordon Brown, there is no sign that he understands that the monster scheme of ID cards and identity database is hopelessly compromised by the evident carelessness with which the UK government treats our personal information. "I am calling on the European Commission to amend the 1995 directive so as to oblige governments as well as companies to inform their national data protection supervisor when a data protection breach occurs. Scandalously, at present the UK Information Commissioner has no effective tools to compel the notification of security breaches". More information about the Lib Dem opposition to the NDNAD is available here: http://campaigns.libdems.org.uk/dna and about our opposition to ID cards and database here: http://www.libdems.org.uk/noidcards/ In response to the continued failure of the UK government to safeguard personal data, Sarah Ludford has written twice to EU justice Commissioner Franco Frattini to request a green paper on the adequacy of EU rules on data protection and data security, but Commissioner Frattini has declined her request.
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Thu 25th Sep 2008: Sarah on combatting terrorism and protection of personal data . Thu 26th Jun 2008: European Commission should pursue UK over data protection failures. Fri 25th Apr 2008: Sarah demands assurances for data protection. Tue 26th Feb 2008: Letter to the Daily Telegraph about data protection and civil liberties. Tue 12th Feb 2008: Sarah's campaign to sort out the UK's data protection problems. Mon 21st Jan 2008: EU enquiry needed into UK breaches of data protection. Thu 7th Jun 2007: EU data-sharing needs robust data protection. Fri 26th Jan 2007: Do you know your data protection rights? Fri 24th Nov 2006: EU data protection watchdogs condemn SWIFT . Fri 6th Oct 2006: Data protection and democracy sacrificed for PNR agreement. Wed 6th Sep 2006: EU 'feeble' on data protection. Tue 5th Sep 2006: Euro-MP fights for privacy protection for personal data. Tue 29th Apr 2003: Needed: 'robust' EU Data Protection Supervisor. Related Speeches:Tue 30th Jan 2007: Data protection - SWIFT and PNR. Thu 26th Oct 2006: Exchange with Commissioner Mandelson in the European Parliament on Fair Trade. Wed 14th Jun 2006: Data protection "essential" for EU databases. Tue 15th Nov 2005: Data protection and EU databases. Mon 12th Nov 2001: Published and promoted by Baroness Sarah Ludford MEP, 36b St Peter's Street, London N1 8JT. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |