![]() |
Baroness Sarah Ludford MEP Liberal Democrat Member of the European Parliament for London |
![]() |
| Baroness Sarah Ludford MEP | <office@sarahludfordmep.org.uk> | 22nd November 2008 |
Anti-terrorism failures unacceptable - Ludford10.29.47am UTC (GMT +0000) Fri 7th Jul 2006 On the anniversary of the July 7th London bombs, London Liberal Democrat MEP Baroness Sarah Ludford is accusing European governments of gross hypocrisy in their failure to implement EU measures passed 4 years ago for preventing and punishing terrorists. "There is a willingness to throw away hard-won rights like protection from arbitrary detention or snooping on our emails. Yet essential legislation to make sure terrorists could be caught and convicted through cross-border cooperation has still not been put fully into effect." "This gross negligence makes a mockery of the suffering of victims, in Madrid in 2004 as well as in London last year, and betrays the consistent demands of Europe's citizens for the EU to be an effective force in combating crime and terrorism." Sarah Ludford also deplored the problems victims and their families have faced in receiving proper compensation. Many are, disgracefully, still waiting. "Tony Blair should hang his head in shame at the appalling extra stress and suffering caused to victims and bereaved families by the gross incompetence of his government's Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme. Many have been left in an intolerable limbo over the past 12 months."
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Mon 5th Nov 2007: New EU anti-terrorism laws must pass necessity test. Tue 4th Sep 2007: EU anti-terrorism policy need a reality check. Thu 1st Mar 2007: EU-US anti terror fight must work both ways - Ludford. Wed 21st Feb 2007: Ludford condemns Polish MEP's anti-semitic booklet. Thu 21st Oct 2004: Barroso's proposal unacceptable, says Sarah Ludford MEP. Thu 12th Sep 2002: EU-US Anti-Terrorism Agreement. Thu 21st Mar 2002: Published and promoted by Baroness Sarah Ludford MEP, 36b St Peter's Street, London N1 8JT. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |